Market is in a bubble: actress Mila Kunis is getting into stocks

‘I’ve just started investing in stocks, which is new for me,” actress Mila Kunis tells CNBC. Please notice the sign: “Strategic Thinking: Mila Kunis On Equity Strategy”. I found the (short) video quite funny.

This is a contrarian signal in my opinion. Quite powerful also, if you ask me. It reinforces my current view: markets are in a bubble.

On the other hand, interest rates are quite low. I think this bubble has legs.

So, um, what to do? Timing the market is a fool’s game. I’m slowly building a high-dividend yield stock portfolio. Quest for high-dividend yielding stocks has a rationale.

We are in a bubble

I think we are in a bubble.

The thought occurred to me when I saw a recent Newsweek front page screaming: Shares Are Cheap! The New Stock Market Boom! Well, just kidding.

I was perusing Investing in a Low-Growth World, by Jeremy Grantham.

Note: GMO is Grantham’s global investment management firm.


The Fed’s negative real rates regime, designed to badger us into riskier investments in order to push up equity prices and grab a short-term wealth  effect (that must be given back one day when least comfortable and least expected), has gone on for a long and, for me, boring time. This low interest rate period is serving, therefore, as a sneak preview of what a permanently lower rate regime might look like (although any permanently lower rates reflecting lower GDP growth would be by no means as low as these engineered rates that we are currently experiencing). So what are some of these effects? The artificially low T-Bill rates first work their way slowly up the curve. Next, the most obviously competitive type of equities – high yield stocks – begin to be bid up ahead of the rest of the market, as has happened. “I’ve just got to squeeze out some higher rates somewhere, anywhere,” is the pension fund plea. Then, this low rate competition begins to filter into other securities, historically sought after for their higher yields: higher-grade real estate, where the “cap rates” slowly fall; and, unfortunately, also forestry and farmland, mainly of the larger and more standard varieties that appeal to institutions, which show declines in their required yields, i.e., their prices rise.

Another quote:

In the meantime for us at GMO it means emphasizing care and maintaining a heightened sense of value discipline, not only in stock selection, as the whole world is once again bid up over fair value in a way so typical of the post 1994 era, but also in forestry and farmland. GMO has investments in those areas too and recognizes the need to sidestep overpricing by emphasizing the nooks and crannies. Fortunately there are more nooks and deeper crannies in forests and farmland than there are in almost any other area, certainly including stocks.

Another quote:

Investment Implications

Courtesy of the above Fed policy, all global assets are once again becoming overpriced. This reminds me of the idea sometimes attributed to Einstein that a workable definition of madness is constantly repeating the same actions but expecting a different outcome! But, as always, asset prices are not uniformly overpriced: emerging markets and, we believe, Japan are only moderately overpriced. European stocks are also only a little expensive, but in today’s world are substantially more risky than normal. The great global franchise companies also seem only moderately overpriced. Forestry and farmland, which is not super-prime Midwestern, is also only moderately overpriced but comes with our nook and cranny sticker attached. But much of everything else is once again brutally overpriced. Notably, U.S. stocks (ex “quality”) now sell at a negative seven-year imputed return on our numbers and most global growth stocks are close to zero expected return. As for fixed income – fugetaboutit! Most of it has negative estimated returns on our data, and longer debt, as always, carries that risk that may be slight in any period, but is horrific if it occurs – accelerating inflation.

Okay, enough quotes. Forestry and farmland, anyone? When is the average investor going to buy forestry and farmland as diversification? When prices of more readily available investments are high! This leads me to think that the stock market is in a bubble.

Nobody knows when this bubble will burst. I don’t think it will burst while the FED keeps interest rates so low, anyway.